Friday 26 June 2009 9:11:03 pm

In some countries projects are started to try to save the enviorment. To create more green and reduce polluition. But at the same time sertain political groups are making a fuss about the costs. For example when they decide to purify water in some region to start better water of the land and to cultivate the land then the first thing they complaint about are the costs.

But what is more important? A few millions or billions spend on a project that could result in more forrest, agricultural lands etc. Or a project about new fighter planes?
Does everything even humand kind it's future on our planet have to be measured in money? In the end there would only be alot of piles of worthless paper and a lot of dead people. Because the destruction of the enviorment was the result of hard money making.

A other example is the car and fuel industries. When a shortage of fule starts then cars would not be manufactured and not be used. But nevertheless instead of promoting new technology and triying to get rid of fossil fuel the major fossil fuel based indutries just keep going.

 Alert moderator