Encouraging Innovation - shift in mind set required?

You need to be logged in to get access to the forums. You can do so here

Author Responses

Entrant

Posted by Marc Rechter

Tuesday 18 August 2009 4:24:16 pm

It is encouraging to see that there are some very good ideas being generated as a result of the Good Entrepreneur contest. Nevertheless, given a European population of 830 million, one would expect substantially more than 196 entries in a competition as broadly publicized as this. Perhaps a cause of such a low turn out is a (generalized) lack of interest in innovation among younger generations.

Is Europe loosing the battle for science driven technology development? How can our younger generations be motivated to dedicate themselves to research and development?

 Alert moderator

Entrant

Posted by Norman Davison

Tuesday 18 August 2009 5:45:48 pm

Yes Mark you have hit on a very serious problem, Invention/inovation via the garage entrepreneur ( clasical route Edison, Wilbur&Orvile Wright , Bill Gates, etc.) is dying. It is very very serious, and no one is bothered about it.

Invention now is seen to be the domain of the big corporation ? and the huge research budget ! by the young . This is wrong ! Wrong ! wrong! and worst of all it destroys the human spirit for conceiving and developing new tools and processes.

There are other factors which are re-inforcing this perspective of invention.

1) An out-dated and frustrating patent system contributes to this ( Not a single human bothered to reply to my article on Patent dosn't protect the little guy/verses NASCOPY which is faster and gives coverage in 90% of the planet including China.)

2) Industry has moved from geniune multi-discipline engineers to Over-specialisation . ( This prevents cross discipline understanding of engineering )

3) There is a very strong belief in the heads of the young that Only Zeros's and One's is technology, all other engineering is low tech . If this belief wasn't so wide spread it would be completely risable.

4) The United Kingdom in particular has allways accounted the smell of a horse more honourable than the smell of Engine Oil ( something to do with the social /economic structure .

These are the main factors , hope it adds a little clarification

 Alert moderator

Entrant

Posted by Alex Hanganu

Tuesday 18 August 2009 7:33:58 pm

Indeed Marc & Norman, the entries in this contest make you wonder. Not only the number of entries is intriguing to me, but also is the low degree in which they address the judging panel criteria.

Take a look at the so called "popular" entries on the first pages. How many of them have a quantifiable environmental impact?

I am not so sure about this contest being "widely publicised". Google it and you will find out there are no social reverberation on the outside world, I am sure the millions of green activists never heard about it yet. Again, it makes you wonder!

 Alert moderator

Entrant

Posted by Luke Miller

Tuesday 18 August 2009 7:51:25 pm

Hi Marc,

I find your questions regarding the position of Europe compared to the world very interesting. I find it intriguing to see where people think Europe is currently positioned compared to other parts of the world as well. Has Europe already lost some of it influence as an innovation front-runner? If so, will it continue to do so?

As Norman pointed out the current Patent system does have limititations, however I found the following graphic really interesting in terms of positioning different parts of the world on innovation. Although it is only from one perspective and is driven off patent numbers, it can be used as one indicator for innovation.

The McKinsey & World Economic Forum “Innovation Heat Map"
http://whatmatters.mckinseydigital.com/flash/innovation_clusters/

Cheers,
Luke

 Alert moderator

Entrant

Posted by Marc Rechter

Tuesday 18 August 2009 11:30:15 pm

Hi Norman, and thanks for your contribution. I agree that Europe is facing a huge challenge in getting its bright minds to work on creating (disruptive) technologies. I do not think that it is too late for this, and certainly there is space for both bottom-up and top-down driven innovation. Some of the brightest ideas are born the "Bill Gates" way, however probably the overwhelming majority of new technology is driven by close and coordinated cooperation between industry, academics and government. I believe that it is up to all of these institutions to create motivating and attractive platforms for young talent to join. The current change in global realities could certainly help create such a change in mind set. Most important however, is the positive impact we can ourselves have as parents and influencers on our children and youth in general, by creating an awareness of the importance of science. We certainly try to, among others through the implementation of our Algarve Energy Park.

 Alert moderator

Entrant

Posted by Marc Rechter

Tuesday 18 August 2009 11:54:43 pm

Hi Alex, I just did a quick search on Google for Good Entrepreneur, and it seems that there is quite a widespread online presence of the competition. This rather confirms my thought that there is a more generalized lack of interest in science based innovation at this time. This can also be observed in the way the general public take new technologies for granted, but mostly lack any idea of how these products and technologies were derived. In a world where technological change will increasingly be a critical driver for moving towards a more sustainable society, reviving a more general interest in science will be crucial to the "absorption rate" of sustainable solutions. The impact starts at home, so let your kids know why there are exciting opportunities for them in maths, physics, biology and chemistry (I have a feeling that the cool kids of the next generation will not be the MBA´s, but those that are able to contribute to effective science driven solutions).

 Alert moderator

Entrant

Posted by Marc Rechter

Wednesday 19 August 2009 12:42:14 am

Hi Luke - and thank you very much for the comments and highly enlightening McKinsey Innovation Heat Map.
Frankly, whichever way you look at this data map, it is a frighteningly strong reminder of the bad shape we are in here in Europe (try to see how many European cities among the global top 50 - perhaps 2 or 3...). This is a direct reflection of the per capita investment in technology R&D across the continents, where Europe has historically been lagging.
I believe the current global changes offer great opportunities and threats for Europe:
On the down side, Europe has never been in a weaker global competitive position - an aging population, scarce natural resources (and increasing dependence on foreign natural resources), and inability to compete at the industrial level with emerging economies. One of the only ways to maintain its geo-political and economic competitiveness is through aggressive acceleration of the implementation of renewable energy sources (allowing for energy independence), in conjunction with a massive increase in (disruptive) technology output.
The unique window of opportunity that has opened up to Europe within the current global environment, is based on the fact that Europe has had a head start in two crucial sectors - renewable energy, and health care. The ability of Europe to take advantage of this window, will depend on the extend to which Government and private sector players are able to efficiently channel funding into well targeted technology development programs. At EU level, the FP7 program is a good effort, but with a €50 bio 6 year budget probably not enough to outpace investment and innovation levels in the US and Asia.
Therefore we are lobbying for a renewed effort on increased R&D budgets both at the pubic and private levels. The above also underlies our efforts for the implementation of a new model R&D cluster (the Algarve Energy Park), which is focused on maximizing the effectiveness of R&D investments, as well as engaging the general public in science and technology, such that greater awareness and interest in scientific research and development is created. Not only a means to a more sustainable future, but also a sine qua non for maintaining our relative competitiveness in a quickly changing global landscape.


 Alert moderator

Rating:
  • Currently 3/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry

by amanda bal
That was interesting.

by Karim Jaroudi
any info about leather tanners in Kazak?

by FishBowl Inafishbowl
Inafishbowl.com founder and entrepren...

REGISTER NOW to contribute to discussions

Rating:
  • Currently 3/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry
Anne-Kathrin Kuhl...
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 2.5/5 Stars.
View entry
Rating:
  • Currently 3/5 Stars.
View entry
Sandeep Manohar N...
Rating:
  • Currently 3/5 Stars.
View entry
Markus count Matu...
Rating:
  • Currently 3/5 Stars.
View entry