60 Seconds is impossible to explain anything technical .
To understand the significance of my process, you have to understand the huge impact that the ink-jet had on the printing industry . It took printing from an expensive specialised arcane proces and put DTP in the handsof any one who could afford a basic PC.
(Because of the importance of this proces I do not intend to keep it in house I intend to licence it widely,to interested parties at a low cost.)
The Sand jet does exactly the same . It permitsthe following materials to be placed in a thin film on to any suitable substrate. Cement, reconstituted limestone, gypsum, silicates, PPC.
By acurately placing these materials which are in the range of 500-750 microns, high tensile thin films can be created . (Masive reduction in consumables.
If this is used on XPS substrates , we now combine light weight with high strength.
( Think surfboard and you have got it . think banana plant structure )
Energy consumtion of the sandjet 5 my curent model is 350mili watt.
This is much, much less than conventional (and inaccurate ) projection coating . which leaves more material on the floor and the operator than on the work in hand. ( and Bob the builder has never been good at producing a very accurate liquid composition for guniting or for that mater casting.
The most powerfull argument against SIPS has been that they require additional work at the finishing stage of a building, which negates their 40% cost advantage .
With the advent of my high tensile (Moncoque) finished SIP this is no longer a valid argument
For a more detailed History and advantage of SIPS in terms of energy please go to my website. http://nwdavison.magix.net/website
Report to a moderator
I wish to report the following item:
by Norman Davison
View on LinkedIn