Bob Hessey says: Recap:- Hazardous wastes contribute to 'climate change' they also,
when dumped into rivers & oceans, pollute our seas & aquatic life, which we humans and other life forms consume. Incineration plants,
pollute our atmosphere & create a quarter tonne of toxic ash for every
tonne of waste 'incinerated'. There is a way to eliminate such
unnecessary 'carbon footprints', by using Nature's help, which provides
Free, Unlimited, tremendous Heat, enough to totally incinerate all
hazardous wastes placed in the 'incineration chamber', which encases
any 'incineration residues', leaving them safely inside the massive
'storage chamber'. Existing waste collection/delivery companies will
be used (to safeguard existing jobs. There are 1,000 plus of these
Free Heat generators, worldwide; each free heat generating owning
country will be paid per tonne of incinerated wastes, thereby greatly
Increasing their national Income, for Free! Everyone Wins!

Bob Hessey says: Summary of
Disposable Hazardous Waste Container
Suggestion


If nations are truly concerned about safe toxic waste disposal,
there should be plenty of willing co-operation.
Geologists work on the rims of many volcanoes, worldwide, every week,
so their help should be very useful.
If 'modern 'incineration plants, can truly, safely dispose of toxic wastes
the following suggestions will also truly work, at a much lower cost,
to everyone concerned.
*There are about a 1,000 active volcanoes worldwide, mostly in poor,
remote areas, so there are plenty to choose from; We only really need to
use one active volcano, and one willing, co-operative country.

*Toxic wastes are already collected, from many areas, in safe,
tried and tested containers.
We could use existing, 'safe' containers. *Toxic Waste storage facilities
already exist; we could use existing storage facilities, or dump the lot
directly into the volcano as the toxic waste material is delivered.
(Or, we can make our own Disposable hazardous waste containers,
from scrap rubber & plastic waste materials (tyres etc.)
amalgamated, then press-formed/cast into suitable shapes;
which can be permanently-sealed, before dumping directly into
a suitable active volcano).
This will reduce security, and storage costs. * Toxic Ash will be
safely amalgamated with the volcanic magma/molten silica, and
stays within the volcano crater, (no toxic ash disposal problems).

If the volcano erupts, it would have erupted anyway, but the toxic wastes
and ash will have been rendered harmless and safe, by the volcano's
terrific Free Heat.
The country the volcano is sited in will have many new jobs created
for the local people, providing roads up to the volcano rim,
storage facilities, or drop straight into the volcano, upon the toxic wastes
arrival...
The volcano host country will be paid £x-amount per toxic ton disposed of,
which will greatly increase the host country's national wealth.
Geologists already work, testing the volcano magma, usually on a daily basis,
so regular toxic safety checks can be easily carried out.

ReChem type companies are already, supposedly, safely disposing
of toxic wastes, from all around the world, in our overcrowded Britain,
by a 'burning technique' . Which is the Safer/Better method?

Regards, Debusseybob